LESS BAD DOESN’T EQUAL GOOD

 

By Francisco Szekely

Why does a company exist? 

If you’d asked executives this in the 1970s, the most common answer would have been ‘to make money’. Consumers, employees and the natural environment didn’t really figure in their business strategies. Profitability was king. 

Fast-forward a few decades, and that narrow concept is being challenged. General Electric CEO Jack Welch said in 2009: “On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world. Shareholder value is a result, not a strategy. Your main constituencies are your employees, your customers and your products. Managers and investors should not share price increases as their overarching goal. Short-term profits should be allied with an increase in the long-term value of a company.” 

The thinking has evolved, but in practice organizations are taking a while to catch up. Many are still guided by the bottom line, which is not a smart way of dealing with the challenges of the 21st century. Now businesses must deal with resource scarcity, food security, climate change, and the urgent need for an energy transition to survive the long term. 

These challenges therefore have an impact on the way we do business. Companies need to think ‘forward and outward’. ‘Thinking forward’ means planning business models and strategies according to global trends. ‘Thinking outward’ is about managing internal and external actors and issues that affect business, consumers, and society in general. 

Over the past 25 years, as society’s sustainability challenges have increased in urgency, many organizations have adopted a triple bottom-line approach, measuring their performance along economic, social, and environmental criteria. This approach focuses on minimizing harm while generating maximum profits. But today, reducing your footprint is not enough. Less harmful does not equal good. 

What does ‘good’ mean? 

This question raises further dilemmas. What does ‘good’ look like? And ‘good’ for whom? The answer lies in stakeholder value creation. Organizations must focus on creating value not only for shareholders but for stakeholders too. And that includes the biggest, most silent stakeholder of all: the natural environment. 

Some organizations are starting to shift their focus from ‘less bad’ to ‘good’. We’ve found that their journey generally follows four stages. Take for example a household goods manufacturer: 

Stage 1: survival
The focus of the company is to foster innovation to create quality consumer goods at affordable prices with fair return for investors. The critical stakeholders here are customers and investors. 

Stage 2: environmentalism
The priority is now to create environmentally friendly products while meeting the needs of the customer. Here the company focuses beyond its boundaries and tries to influence the behavior of its supply chain. 

Stage 3: social responsibility
Now the company tries to promote healthy homes and happy communities through a restorative economic system. The organization begins to move towards the stakeholder system perspective, viewing itself as part of a broader ecosystem. 

Stage 4: sustainability
The focus has shifted to improving the lives of all its stakeholders, the health of their environments and quality of communities through transformative household solutions. In this stage, rather than surviving or maintaining the status quo, the organization strives to improve society and the natural environment. 

Some companies are a long way along this journey. The household goods company Seventh Generation, for example, co-founded by Jeffrey Hollender in 1988, started in stage 2. Its founding mission was “to provide high-quality, environmentally responsible products that work as well or better than traditional brands”. During the 2000s, however, the company made a profound change to its mission, moving from selling all-natural cleaning products to creating healthy homes – a shift from stage 2 to stage 3. The organization launched an internal thinking process to answer the questions ‘What is a healthy home?’, ‘How can we contribute to build one?’, and ‘Who should be our partner in this endeavour?’

Then there’s the carpet company Interface. By 2016 it was the one of the largest carpet manufacturers in the world, with net sales of almost US$1 billion. Now the company is striving towards what its late founder Ray Anderson called ‘mission zero’. This involves a commitment to eliminate all waste generated by their products and maximizing the company’s positive impact on consumers, society, the government, and future generations. Anderson did not decide to simply reduce waste by a certain percentage; he instead decided to solve 100 per cent of the problem and design products that would create value for shareholders and all stakeholders – including the environment.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “LESS BAD DOESN’T EQUAL GOOD

    • YOU CAN REPUBLISH OUR POSTS!
      Since https://venitism.wordpress.com is a free-content blog, there are no copyright entanglements, and you can republish our posts without charge. Every day, we publish more than thirty posts. If you like our content, you are interested in it, or you want to single it out for mockery, then you can feature it on your web page, print it in your newsletter, or hang a copy on a wall and throw darts at it! Copy-paste, reprint, translate, make derivative works as you please. Anyone copying our content will be a very good friend of ours! We would greatly appreciate a link to our blog.
      Venitism is a first-in-class content-free business blog that provides warp speed, on the ground reporting from anywhere in the world. We arm our readers with ideas that help them become smarter, more creative, and more courageous in their work. To do that, we enlist the foremost experts in business, collaborating to express their thoughts in the most influential way possible.
      New ideas in business are rare and precious, and one of the primary reasons readers turn to our blog. Readers come to us not only to stay on top of new developments in business thinking, but also to change the way they and their organizations actually do things. Our readers enjoy accurate, original reporting, untainted by establishment spin.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s