Texas’s opioid crisis is evident from the increase in private insurance claim lines with opioid-related diagnoses in many parts of the state from 2007 to 2016, according to data from FAIR Health, a national, independent, nonprofit organization dedicated to bringing transparency to healthcare costs and health insurance information. San Antonio had the largest increase of the areas studied, at 141,022 percent, with Dallas second at 40,562 percent. Accompanying the increases were a variety of healthcare procedures and services designed to deal with the epidemic.

In Texas, the five most common procedures associated with opioid-related diagnoses in 2016 were laboratory tests. Notably, the patterns of care and treatments sought in Texas differed from those of other states profiled in the third FAIR Health white paper on the nation’s opioid epidemic, Peeling Back the Curtain on Regional Variation in the Opioid Crisis: Spotlight on Five Key Urban Centers and Their Respective States. Drawing on its database of more than 23 billion privately billed healthcare claims, FAIR Health focused on the five states—California, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas—where the nation’s five most populous cities (Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia and Houston) are located. The results showed substantial regional variation in trending associated with the opioid crisis and the treatments, tests and procedures associated with those receiving opioid-related care.

The term “opioid-related diagnoses” referred to four diagnoses: opioid abuse, opioid dependence, heroin overdose and opioid overdose (i.e., overdose of opioids excluding heroin). Opioid dependence is more severe than opioid abuse. By compiling and analyzing the claim lines for healthcare treatment for individuals with these diagnoses, FAIR Health revealed in this white paper the scale and variety of approaches employed to deal with this crisis. Claims provide a strong measure for healthcare statistics because they reflect healthcare usage and their information reflects the assessments of providers, whose training and experience qualify them as judges of health conditions.

Among the findings in Texas, some of which deviate from findings in other states:

  • In 2016, the number one procedure code in the distribution associated with opioid-related diagnoses was G0479, “Drug test(s), any number of drug classes, not optical.” On an aggregate basis, it was also the state’s second most costly procedure; another drug test, G0483, “Drug test, definitive, 22+ classes,” represented the highest expenditure.
  • Other common procedures included tests for creatinine and pH, as well as urinalysis, possibly indicating greater use of urinalyses than some other states.
  • San Antonio and its immediate surrounding areas constituted 5 percent of the population in 2016, but 66 percent of the distribution of claim lines with opioid-related diagnoses in the period 2007-2016.
    • In San Antonio in the period 2007-2016, claim lines with an opioid overdose diagnosis outnumbered those with a heroin diagnosis by 90 percent to 10 percent.
  • Dallas, at 5 percent of the population in 2016, constituted 23 percent of the distribution of claim lines with opioid-related diagnoses in the period 2007-2016.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s